Movie Reviews

Movie Review: The Vanishing (1988) – Creepy Dark Thriller, Foreign Version Better

Written by Tim Krabbe and George Sluizer
Directed by George Sluizer

If you seek out this title, do not be fooled and pick up the American version of the film starring Kiefer Sutherland and Sandra Bullock.  I’d seen that film many years ago and thought it was all right.  Even then, I thought that if the ending were different the film would be so much better.  It has one of those Hollywood “happily ever after” endings that just ended up leaving me feeling empty.  The original version of the story is actually a French film and based on the novel “The Golden Egg” by Tim Krabbe.  People had told me to check out this version, but I didn’t have the opportunity to until recently.

A couple, Rex and Saskia (portrayed by Gene Bervoets and Johanna ter Steege respectively), are on a cycling trip driving through the European countryside when they run out of gas in a tunnel.  In many ways they are a typical couple.  They are in love, but they bicker.  She sees they are about to run out of gas, but he doesn’t listen to her, then they have one of those “I told you so” arguments.

Rex walks off to get gas, leaving Saskia behind in the car even though she begs him not to go.  It would seem she has disappeared on him, but she has just walked out of the tunnel and away from him for safety.

The tension of this situation is still fresh as they make their way into the town.  They stop for a while, and he apologizes.  As they are making up, he makes a promise to her never to abandon her again.  They take a break at a rest area and picnic, not realizing what is stalking them.

Saskia disappears from the rest stop when she runs into the store to buy drinks and is never seen again.

Raymond (portrayed by Bernard-Pierre Donnadieu) is a man with a wife and two daughters.  He would seem to be living an ordinary life, except that he has a dark side he has explored and is not revealing to his family.  He is Saskia’s abductor.

A series of flashbacks shows him crafting his plan.  This works well when intertwined with the present time, which is three years after Saskia disappeared.  For three years, Rex diligently looks for Saskia, advertising and putting up posters.  He has another relationship but hasn’t truly moved on.  He moved to France to be near to where Saskia disappeared and keep himself in the public eye, believing that someone somewhere had to see something.

The dual sides of Raymond are intriguing in a way.  He seems to be almost two entirely different personalities.  There’s no real explanation given for why he ultimately does it.  Essentially, it seems to be an explanation of “because I wanted to see if I could”.

Eventually, Raymond becomes intrigued by the fervidness of Rex’s continued searching for his missing girlfriend.  He begins to reach out to Rex and play with his mind.  Finally, he makes the overture that Rex can find out what happened to Saskia, if he does everything Raymond tells him to.

For the audience, this is suspenseful, especially If you haven’t seen the other version.  There are hints that Saskia could still be alive as Raymond has questioned neighbors if they can hear screaming coming from his country home.  At the same time, it seems that Rex is about to put himself in foolish danger.  The suspense works very well and makes the film reminiscent of a Hitchcock film.

The acting is very good.   Although it was distracting to have to read subtitles, I managed to enjoy the performances. Bervoets and ter Steege really have some good chemistry together.  They come off as a typical couple who are in love but have the usual bumps in life caused by different personalities.  Donnadieu is fantastic as Raymond.

I have to compare all of these characters to the American version, and the actors are just ten times above the counterparts.  Sutherland comes off as just downright mean to Bullock, who seems to be a ditzy and lined up from the beginning to be a victim rather than a strong woman emotionally.  The biggest change for me though was between Jeff Bridges portrayal of the abductor and Donnadieu’s.  Where there seemed to be an explanation that Bridge’s character wanted to see if his family would still love him as much even if he were really a terrible person and they didn’t know about it, there’s no explanation like that here.  Raymond seems to be wrestling with two sides of his own personality and once he’s regarded as a hero by his family over an incident at a canal, he seems to feel the need to feed his darker side, something that has come out before as a child.  There are bits and pieces of this part of his personality that seem to seep through from time to time, but nothing as overtly creepy as the way Bridges portrayed the character which led me to wonder why he didn’t get on someone’s radar for a personality disorder a long time ago.

The sub-titles can be hard for some people to handle with paying attention to what’s going on in the film as well as reading the dialogue.  I had no problems with them, and they were clear and easy to read.

I would definitely recommend the French version of The Vanishing, not just over the American version but also as a fine film.  It really draws on the atmosphere of a creepy old-fashioned thriller and does it well.


5 replies »

  1. That sounds very interesting. I saw the American version with Sutherland and Bridges a long time ago. The French version would also be perfect for me to use for practice. However, I may be blind but I don’t see a link for buying it in your post. I would like to.

  2. The Vanishing was originally The Netherlands’ submission for the Best Foreign Film category at the 1988 Academy Awards, but the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Science rejected the movie, citing the amount of French dialogue. Thus, 1989 saw the first Oscar competition that didn’t have a Dutch film in the running since 1972.

  3. I remember this film being shown in something like the extreme cinema series they used to have on Channel 4 (I think) and how much I liked it. I actually found a lot of the villain’s logic very relatable (I don’t know what that says about me!). I sort of remembered it being slow in the middle, but having just rewatched it, I didn’t have that impression so much.

    There are just three scenes that I would like peoples’ opinions on. Going in reverse order (nearest the end first):

    1) What is the deal with Rex digging up the coins by the tree? Does this really change his mind about drinking the coffee (trying to keep his promise never to leave her?) Or was he always going to drink the coffee?

    2) The bit on the computer screen where Rex seems to be keeping a list of girfriends he has had since Saskia and her name keeps overwriting it. (I can’t help feeling that in some sense Rex is embracing his obsession with Saskia’s disappearance and perhaps even providing him with an all-purpose excuse not to commit).

    Lastly, for me, is one of the most bizarre bits in the entire film and seems to have gone unnoticed.

    3) When Raymond is “practicing” abduction in the town and accidentally tries to persuade into his car a woman who knows him indirectly. Not only does she seem to know what he’s up to, it is actually her who suggests to him that he might do better at rest-stops! (I can’t help wondering if this doesn’t subvert Raymond’s entire modus operandi, which has been to buck what seems to him to have been “predestined.” Is Sluizer trying to tell us that Raymond is kidding himself? Does the episode even really happen? There’s something vaguely mythic about this sequence. Or is just a bad plot-choice by the director (I’d be interested if it was also in the book, if anyone knows) I’m kind of grasping at straws here, and maybe I’m reading too much into it)

Leave a Reply to David BottingCancel reply